What’s turned into a legal battle started with a common inheritance dispute, but recent developments have shifted the focus. Alleged call detail records related to Priya Kapur surfaced on social media late Tuesday, sparking a significant discussion over the will of the late auto-parts mogul, Sunjay Kapur.
These purported records indicate that Priya Kapur’s phone was located in New Delhi on March 21, 2025. This specific date is critical, as Priya had stated in an affidavit that she was in Gurugram on the same day when Sunjay Kapur’s will was signed—a key point of contention in court.
If these records are confirmed and accepted by the court, they could play an essential role in this dispute involving an estate valued at around Rs 30,000 crores. Legal experts warn that discrepancies between sworn statements and digital evidence can lead to increased scrutiny from the court.
“When an affidavit conflicts with digital proof, judges are very cautious,” noted Advocate Swapnil Kothari. “Even a single inconsistency may prompt a deeper examination of the overall situation.”
This development coincides with ongoing objections from Sunjay Kapur’s children, Samaira and Kiaan, who are challenging the validity of the will. They have pointed out several issues, like spelling mistakes and inconsistencies, which, while seemingly minor, could have a significant impact.
Senior Advocate Ashok Paranjpe emphasized that wills of substantial value must have impeccable documentation. “It’s essential that all the paperwork is clear,” he said, highlighting the need for reliable witness testimonies during the will’s execution.
Family law expert Mrunalini Deshmukh added that having a beneficiary present at the will’s signing is not legally required. This raises questions about why Priya’s affidavit stressed her presence if it wasn’t necessary.
However, legal observers advise caution in jumping to conclusions. Advocate Prem Rajani indicated that in high-stakes inheritance conflicts, courts scrutinize every document meticulously. “Details, consistency, and intent are all crucial,” he said.
The Delhi High Court is still deciding if the alleged call records should be accepted as evidence and how much importance they will be given. For the time being, these new developments have turned this family inheritance issue into a closely watched legal case.
