Actor Jacqueline Fernandez faces a new challenge in the ongoing Rs. 200 crore money laundering case linked to alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar. On Monday, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed a response in the Patiala House Court in Delhi, objecting to Jacqueline’s request to be recognized as an approver in the case.
Recently, Jacqueline had sought permission from the court to cooperate with the investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. However, the ED contended that her actions during the investigation did not warrant such a status.
The agency stated that Jacqueline’s role in the case is far from minor. They claimed that she was a “significant beneficiary” of the alleged illegal proceeds and actively took part in the money laundering activities. The ED argued that allowing her approver status would undermine the gravity of the charges against her.
Furthermore, the ED pointed out that Jacqueline maintained contact with Sukesh Chandrasekhar even after being aware of his criminal past. They asserted that the luxury gifts and financial benefits she received came from the proceeds of the alleged crimes.
The agency also alleged that Jacqueline’s statements during multiple interrogations were inconsistent and incomplete. They indicated that she often had to be confronted with evidence, suggesting that she withheld critical information regarding cash dealings, expensive gifts, and bank transactions, including her ties to individuals like Pinky Irani.
These claims challenge her portrayal as an “unwitting victim” and suggest a more active involvement in the situation. The ED noted that her earlier statements and willingness to cooperate did not absolve her from her alleged participation in money laundering.
Currently, the legal proceedings are at the stage of arguments regarding the charges. Earlier, on April 17, the court had issued notice to the ED following Jacqueline’s plea through her lawyer, Ashish Batra.
Jacqueline has faced previous legal struggles, notably in 2025 when the Delhi High Court dismissed her petition to quash the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) against her, a decision that was later upheld by the Supreme Court.
The court is awaiting Jacqueline’s response to the ED’s objections, with further hearings scheduled soon.
