Ranveer Singh Agrees to Revise Apology Over Controversial Remarks
Ranveer Singh recently informed the Karnataka High Court that he is open to submitting a revised apology related to his comments about Chamundi Devi in the film Kantara. This statement came during a court hearing before Justice M. Nagaprasanna, which was focused on an ongoing controversy.
In court, Singh’s attorney, Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya, noted that Singh had already submitted an affidavit expressing his regret. He also mentioned that the actor is willing to create a new version if necessary. In his initial affidavit, Singh acknowledged that he did not fully grasp that his remarks might offend devotees, emphasizing his respect for all faiths.
Poovayya emphasized that Singh wishes to convey his sincere remorse and has even committed to visit the temple of the deity and offer prayers. He explained that Singh, who grew up in a Sindhi household in Mumbai, may not have been aware of the sensitivities surrounding the issue at the time.
However, the complainant, Prashanth Methal, questioned the authenticity of Singh’s apology, suggesting that it lacked genuine emotion. Methal pointed out that actor-director Rishab Shetty had previously advised Singh against making such comments and urged the court to require a more appropriate affidavit.
Poovayya assured the court that he is willing to discuss the wording of the apology with the complainant and prepare a revised document for submission. Justice Nagaprasanna acknowledged this and postponed the hearing to April 23.
The controversy arose from Singh’s speech at the International Film Festival of India in Goa, where he praised Shetty’s performance in Kantara. When discussing the portrayal of Chamundi Devi, Singh referred to her as a “female ghost” while mimicking a scene from the film, which drew backlash on social media.
Following the remarks, a magistrate in Bengaluru ordered an investigation under the recent Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, leading to an FIR against Singh under laws concerning religious disrespect and public disorder.
In response to the backlash, Singh later approached the High Court, claiming that his comments were misinterpreted and were meant only to highlight Shetty’s work. He reiterated that he had no intention of offending anyone or stirring community tensions.
