The discussion around The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond has picked up steam, especially following claims that the film’s teaser was removed due to legal issues. However, the producers, Sunshine Pictures, have firmly denied these reports.
In a statement, they asserted, “We want to make it clear that the news about the teaser being taken down is entirely false and misleading. Currently, there is no legal order mandating the removal of any content. Both the teaser and the trailer are still available on our official platforms. We urge everyone to avoid spreading unverified and speculative information, as it only leads to confusion.”
This clarification comes as the Kerala High Court scrutinizes the film’s certification by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, during a hearing on petitions requesting a stay on the film’s release, emphasized the importance of how a film portrays Kerala’s secular image. The judge highlighted concerns over potential misrepresentation and whether the film could stir communal tensions.
The court remarked on the need for careful portrayal of Kerala’s diverse culture, expressing concern that misrepresenting events could spark conflict. Justice Thomas noted that since this film claims to be based on true events, the worries raised by petitioners seem to hold some merit. He pointed out that the inclusion of “Kerala” in the title might raise awareness and apprehension among the public, especially if the narrative could be seen as inflammatory.
During the court session, Senior Advocate S. Sreekumar, representing the filmmakers, agreed to temporarily withdraw the existing teasers until the court reaches a decision. He also proposed a special screening for the judge, who plans to watch the film before the next round of hearings.
The sequel follows the controversial first installment that accused women from Kerala of being recruited into ISIS. Opponents of the sequel argue that its marketing materials, especially the tagline “ab sahenge nahin… ladenge,” could provoke conflicts and disrupt public peace. Several petitions challenge the CBFC’s certification, claiming it misrepresents the region and could lead to communal unrest.
The case is set to advance once the court reviews the film in its upcoming screening.
