UK Court Denies Nirav Modi’s Extradition Appeal
A UK court has recently turned down the extradition request from fugitive diamond trader Nirav Modi, solidifying previous decisions and accepting the Indian government’s promise that he wouldn’t face interrogation upon his return to India.
In an 18-page ruling, the high court, led by Justice Jeremy Stuart-Smith and Justice Robert Jay, stated that there were no special circumstances to justify reopening Modi’s case. They viewed the assurances given by India as specific and credible, meant to be taken seriously.
In response to the ruling, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) expressed satisfaction, noting that Modi’s legal challenges had been effectively addressed through persistent efforts. They praised the Crown Prosecution Service’s advocate, Helen Malcolm, and the team from the CBI who traveled to London for the hearing.
What Led to Modi’s Appeal?
Modi’s appeal was initiated in August 2025. His lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, known for representing other Indian fugitives, argued that returning Modi to India would expose him to possible torture and harsh treatment. He referenced a previous UK court case involving another fugitive, Sanjay Bhandari, in which the court acknowledged a risk of violence in Indian prisons.
To support his claims, Modi brought in two witnesses: an Indian lawyer and a former Supreme Court judge, both of whom highlighted the risks he would face if extradited. Fitzgerald pointed out similarities between Modi’s situation and Bhandari’s, emphasizing the perceived threat due to Modi’s wealth and high-profile status.
India’s Standpoint
In defense of Modi’s extradition, the Indian government provided assurances that he would not be interrogated and that the cases against him were ready for trial. They confirmed in writing that no custodial questioning would occur without prior approval from the UK.
The government also ensured that Modi would remain in Arthur Road Prison and would have access to video conferencing for court appearances, enhancing his rights during the proceedings.
Court’s Decision in India’s Favor
The judges agreed that India’s assurances were valid and binding, noting that they were not made lightly. However, they did acknowledge the troubling findings from the earlier Bhandari ruling about the potential for ill-treatment in Indian jails.
The court emphasized the need for “exceptional circumstances” to revisit extradition cases, stating that the Indian government’s promises played a significant role in their decision. They mentioned that while India does not sign treaties against torture, such practices are not permitted by Indian law.
Background on Nirav Modi
Modi is facing serious charges, including defrauding Punjab National Bank of approximately ₹6,498 crore as part of a larger scheme with his uncle, Mehul Choksi. He has been in a UK prison since his arrest by Scotland Yard in March 2019, following a formal extradition request from India. In February 2021, a judge had ruled in favor of his extradition.
He has been labeled a fugitive economic offender under Indian law, with significant assets attached in connection to the allegations, although some funds have been returned to the affected banks.
