The Tightrope Walk of Fast Bowlers in Modern Cricket
Fast bowlers in cricket today face a challenging landscape. A well-aimed bouncer can easily end up as a six, while a perfect yorker might still go for four runs. On top of that, navigating the tight spaces of social media can be even trickier. Jasprit Bumrah recently found this out in a tough way.
After India secured an exciting victory at The Oval, winning the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, Bumrah shared a series of photos on Instagram celebrating his top moments. Instead of cheers, he faced criticism. Some fans accused him of being jealous, claiming he didn’t acknowledge Mohammed Siraj’s contributions.
One comment read, “Why are you being jealous? You should have praised Siraj.”
While Bumrah and England battled it out on the field, another drama was brewing online: Siraj vs. Bumrah. Suddenly, a simple Instagram post sparked talk of rivalry among fans.
The situation was clear. Bumrah played three out of five Tests due to a planned workload management strategy, taking 14 wickets in those games, all of which were matches India didn’t win. In contrast, Siraj participated in all five Tests, bowled an impressive 185.3 overs, and took nine crucial wickets in the final match, leading India to a remarkable win when they seemed on the back foot.
Why Criticize Bumrah?
In Indian cricket, admiration can quickly shift to suspicion. Just months before, Bumrah was celebrated as one of the greats, known for his remarkable performances against Australia and leading India to a T20 World Cup win. Now, he was facing questions about his dedication.
Some fans even highlighted statistics suggesting that India performed better in Tests without Bumrah on the team.
This narrative gained traction, particularly among commentators. Before the series, when it was announced that Bumrah would only play three Tests, discussions revolved around how to secure a series victory given his limited appearances.
But when Siraj shone at The Oval, opinions changed. The once-popular line shifted dramatically from “I believe in Bumrah” to “India believes in Siraj.” While Siraj absolutely deserved the accolades, why rip Bumrah down in the process?
Bumrah has been an essential part of India’s success since he debuted.
Jarrod Kimber, in his book Test Cricket: The Unauthorised Biography, discusses the complex concept of the “spirit of cricket.” He notes that it can be selectively interpreted to suit any argument – proving one side right and the other wrong.
The Stats and Their Misuse
Consider the current debate:
- India with Bumrah in this series: 0 wins.
- India without him: 2 wins.
After India won a Test in Birmingham without Bumrah, a well-known commentator shared a stat saying, “India has won 46 Tests without Bumrah since he debuted, compared to only 27 with him.” While eye-catching, such statements often lack context.
Who takes into account the home Tests where India didn’t need Bumrah? And many forget he didn’t play at home for three years after he started his international career.
Yes, Siraj has been crucial in every SENA Test victory for India in the last decade. But that doesn’t diminish Bumrah’s contributions. Before his entry, India had a win rate of 16% in SENA Tests; that number has now increased to 31%.
Bumrah played a key role in India’s golden period in fast bowling, leading the team to historic wins in Australia, and drawing a series in England. If he had been fit for the last Test during the 2024-25 Border-Gavaskar Trophy, India might have held on to the trophy.
Tendulkar Speaks Out
Even cricket legend Sachin Tendulkar, who typically avoids social media controversies, highlighted the absurdity of the anti-Bumrah sentiment.
Tendulkar remarked, “Bumrah started off well, taking five wickets in the first Test and returning for the third and fourth. The stats show he’s performed exceptionally. Discussions about India winning when he wasn’t playing just seem like coincidence to me.”
Tendulkar emphasized Bumrah’s exceptional talent and consistent performance, placing him at the top alongside the best in the game.
Workload Management: Essential, Not Optional
While the management of Bumrah’s workload may not have been ideal, it’s important to understand that cricket isn’t just about raw numbers. Releasing a talented player before a crucial Test might have seemed questionable, especially with Siraj performing superbly.
Bumrah has bowled significantly more overs than many of his peers since debuting in 2016, without the chance to choose his matches freely. He has taken on the pressure in tricky situations time and time again.
Bumrah is no ordinary fast bowler; his unique bowling style is mesmerizing and also puts a lot of strain on his body. Expecting him to bowl continuously without any repercussions shows a lack of understanding about the skills that make him exceptional. Therefore, managing his workload is not just a choice—it’s a necessary step to preserve a rare talent for future battles.
– Ends
