In a new twist to the inheritance case of the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur, legal experts are questioning the legitimacy of a Will put forward by his third wife, Priya Kapur. This comes as the estate, valued at around Rs 30,000 crores, is at the center of a complex legal battle. Advocates are pointing out that the Will might not meet the required legal standards and lacks the necessary consent from the appointed executor.
During a recent court session on December 10, 2025, lawyers representing Kapur’s children, Samaira and Kiaan, raised concerns about serious flaws in the Will. They highlighted that Shradha Suri Marwah, named as executor in the Will, failed to take control of the estate’s assets or start the probate process, which should have occurred following Sunjay Kapur’s passing.
Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani argued that Suri did not fulfill her responsibilities, stating, “The defendant has completely neglected the requirements set forth in the Will.” He emphasized that, according to the document, probate was compulsory, leaving no room for interpretation.
The situation grew more complicated when it was revealed that Suri had reached out to Priya Kapur back in June 2025, suggesting she should begin probate proceedings herself. This admission raises doubts about whether the Will was ever intended to be implemented fully. Suri’s prior claim that she was unaware of her role as executor further questions the validity of the Will, as Jethmalani pointed out that an executor cannot be appointed without prior consent.
Legal experts have echoed these concerns, underscoring the implications of any inconsistencies in the Will for its enforceability. Notably, the children’s legal team has asked the court to designate an independent administrator to manage Sunjay Kapur’s overseas assets until the Will’s validity is established. There is a significant fear that assets could be mishandled without court supervision, potentially leading to international legal disputes.
Sunjay Kapur’s estate includes properties in New York and the UK, along with investments linked to Aureus Investments Pvt Ltd. The children argue that ownership claims to these assets hinge on the disputed Will. Legal specialists express that leaving control with one party while the Will is under scrutiny poses unnecessary risks.
The ongoing discussions highlight the urgency of appointing an independent administrator to ensure that the estate is protected amid the uncertainties surrounding the Will. As the Delhi High Court evaluates the matter, key questions remain about whether the Will meets legal requirements and whether it has been acted upon as needed.
This inheritance battle not only revolves around family ties but is becoming a significant legal saga that will determine the future of a substantial estate.
